Mirena Attorney Remarks on Side Effects

mirena attorney

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

Our team of attorneys are now investigating claims and prepared to file Mirena lawsuitsinvolving the intrauterine contraceptive device Mirena®. Manufactured by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mirena is an IUD device [intrauterine device] that must be inserted by a trained health care provider and is intended to provide contraceptive protection for up to five years. Some women have experienced serious adverse side-effects and potentially life-threatening complications following the implantation of theMirena device, including perforation of or imbedment in the uterus.

Mirena Lawyer: An Analysis of Mirena IUD Side Effects

More than 100 Mirena lawsuits have been pending for trial in a Bergen County court of New Jersey, the state where Bayer’s U.S. head office is located. A similar number of lawsuits have also been filed in federal courts now centralized at a New York district court. First introduced in 2000, the birth control IUD has been subject of more than 70,000 adverse events, including over 1,300 uterus perforations in the last four years, reported to the FDA ever since. There are reports of young women who had to undergo surgical removal of their uterus and multiple surgeries following uterine perforation and pelvic complications caused by Mirena IUD.

Kelli Baugh, the plaintiff selected for the first Mirena lawsuit trial, was one of the many unfortunate women who chose Mirena birth control IUD. The contraceptive device migrated and damaged her uterus and pelvic organs. Now in her twenties, the South Carolina resident has had a hysterectomy or uterus removal surgery. She is now required to take estrogen daily and has to undergo surgical intervention for regular menopause. Her Mirena lawsuit claims that faulty design of the product was responsible for its migration and consequent injuries.

A Missouri woman underwent a high risk surgery after it was discovered that migrated Mirena IUD had punctured her uterine wall. Another Mirena lawsuit filed by an Ohio woman highlights how the contraceptive embedded in the uterus required her to undergo hysterectomy, stomach tissue excision, and appendectomy.

Most Reported Mirena Side Effects

  • Mirena IUD Migration: Displaced IUD causes multiple injuries and uterus damage. A number of women have suffered from permanent uterus damage caused by Mirena migration. A 20-year-old had to undergo uterus removal surgery following uterine perforation caused by the IUD. In another case, doctors had to open rib cages of a user to remove the Mirena IUD from her body.
  • Pelvic Inflammatory Diseases: Mirena birth control side effects lead to infection, inflammation, and other pelvic complications. Pelvic injuries are more severe in cases of Mirena migration.
  • Vaginal Problems:  Vaginitis, dysmenorrheal, intercourse pain, vaginal bleeding, etc. are commonly visible in women using Mirena contraceptive for a long time.
  • Ovarian Cysts: Levonorgestrel synthetic hormone in the IUD often causes formation of painful cysts in the ovary. Almost 13 percent of Mirena birth control device users face this risk.
  • Post-Use Pregnancy Problems: Ectopic pregnancy and post-use miscarriages are among the most reviewed side effects of Mirena contraceptive. The IUD has failed to stop fertilization of the egg outside the ovary in many cases, while surgeries to remove the displaced device during pregnancy involve life-threatening risks.
  • Menstrual Disorder:  Irregular bleeding, spotting, shorter menstrual cycles, and abdominal cramps are felt within weeks of using the contraceptive.
  • Other Side Effects: Secondary or removal surgeries necessitated by device migration, hypertension and heart strokes, genitourinary infections, depression, angioedema, back pain, etc.

Is Mirena Just Another IUD Gone Wary

The rising number of Mirena lawsuits reminds the ill-fated consumers of their suffering due to the side effects of Dalkon Shield IUD. Over 300,000 lawsuits were filed against the manufacturer A. H. Robins that resulted in over $3 billion compensation. In 2009, the FDA restricted Bayer from promoting Mirena as the safest birth control option and included the IUD marketing campaign under its “Bad Ad Program.”

Doctors are wary of prescribing Mirena IUD to woman, especially those yet to be pregnant, fearing the damage it can cause to the uterus. Studies by the American Public Health Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that healthcare professionals consider Mirena birth control a risk and prefer to go with other alternatives.

If you experienced adverse Mirena side effectsrequired surgery or have a loved one who suffered death following the implantation of Mirena, you may have a potentialMirena lawsuit.

FOR A FREE CASE EVALUATION:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Phone Number (required)

    Case Details

    captcha

    NOTE: Our team of attorneys will review potential cases for all fifty states, including Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin and Wyoming.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *